ESPAÑOL ENGLISH

GP&H Suite

Ciserus

GP&H Suite

14 Jul

Civil Aviation Law Reforms

by

The reforms published on the Official Journal in the past month of June related to the articles 49, 50, 52, 62, 87, 2, 42, 84 and 87 of the Civil Aviation Law have been constantly cited by the media and social media, because of the supposedly new rights that the passengers have related to the national airlines, however no one has discussed the real consequences that this has to the Airlines.

To begin, the government has to understand that it is vital that when issuing new legislation to regulate airline activities, there must be a balance to be maintained between protecting the rights of users and the rights of air service providers, so that the latter cannot fail to be sustainable.

It is not that there is no legislation that regulates the service, however, it must be appropriate and coordinated with others at international level to give the confidence and freedom to fly to the passengers of these services, this instead of those laws that “defend” only the passengers, and they produce a lack of real competition and innovation on the part of the Airlines.

Legislators and users need to take into account that the aviation system is an interdependent system, that is, it operates in a chain, which is composed of airlines, airports, air traffic management, governments and the own passengers, so not all the problems that can cause a bad service by an airline are attributable to it, since these are usually given as a result of factors such as weather, overloaded infrastructure and tight airspace.

Most governments today, such as Mexico, have included in their regulations the obligation of airlines to pay their users compensation or provide assistance in case of delayed flights, which has led in figures stated by IATA (International Air Transport Association), that in 5 years (from 2012 to 2017) airlines have had to increase their spending by 8 billion USD to cover these excessive regulations that have been imposed. This is important because let’s not forget that Airline Service is a Business, so if the Airliner need to invest more money to cover these, the cost for the users will be higher and it will affect the access to these services.

Another of the most publicized subject of the reform of the Mexican Civil Aviation Law is the one called the “Right of Repentance”, which allows passengers on a flight to cancel their booking within a period of 24 hours after purchase and obtain a full refund of the payment, which if it’s well analyze, can bring to consumers more harmful effects than positive, because being the air service a business, airlines will not lose and the way the protect themselves from the right of repentance is overbooking their flights during the period the passenger has to cancel his booking.

In addition to overbooking, this right of repentance will result in an increase in flight fares, a reduction in promotional fares, and less customer satisfaction.

Finally, we must consider a discriminatory treatment that both Mexican and worldwide legislation is given to airlines, because ¿Does the train and buses services have the obligation to reimburse the customer with the right of repentance? the answer is no and this brings with it a distortion of the market and all the competitive disadvantage for this means of transport that is so beneficial for modern society, because it connects quickly peoples and cultures, contributing also 3.5% of the world GDP.

For all of the above, it is considered necessary and urgent to break the challenge that the airlines face every day to deal with the rigorous legislation of countries such as ours, so it is a key challenge to work together with the international organizations such as IATA and ICAO,  and with governments worldwide to standardize regulations in this area, thus giving less confusion to users and efficient operations to airlines.

Noticias anteriores: